Violence, to use or not to use? I don't think violence should be use because you could go to jail or get caught by a teacher. You also could injured your self because of violence. Thats why you sould never use violence.
Oh no my name is jang I was on my way to school but 3men come up and take me to a place where people not go mush after they take me to the place they sad where is your money I said no don't do is no I should out fire fire people came and help me the 3 men run a away.
So violence should not be use this day. The people that have no reason involved in violence. So people had been involved in violence along in violence.
So many people would probabky use violence in a situation that goes like this. You walk into an ally way because there is a plate of cake that has a sign in it that says free. So you go over to it and pick it up but relize it`s made of cardboard (the cake is a lie!) and someone is behind you now thearting you for your money. But should we really use violence in these types of situations? I don`t as it is unreasonable and reckless.
It is unreasonable as it can injure people that might not be in this situation like a hobo or another person who fell for the same trick. To elaborate you can escape by parkouring your way out of the problem, esaly avoiding the problem(yay PPPPAAARRRKKKOOUURR!!!!). For instance your fall for the cake trick and decid to use violence throwing random punches in all directions until you hit a hobo hiding in the dumpster knocking him unconcious. Then (without noticing) you punch another person (who fell for the same trick) in the face breaking his nose and falling over . before hitting the mugger and knocking him out. Congratulations not only did you knock the mugger out but also two bystanders! So thats why violence is unreasonable
"Violence can be a Reasonable Response to an Unreasonable situation".I think sometimes violence can be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation but sometimes words can work.So that is why I choose both.In fact violence can sometimes cause more violence.Well what do you think ?
Some people might ask "How can you protect yourself from a bully ?" Well I could think of some ways .....
1 Scream "FIRE!"
2 Talk to him/them "why are you doing this" ( this doesn't always work)
3 Use violence for self defence .
These are the ways I could think of , so let's put it in a scene.For example you are trapped in an enclosed alley with a bully about to beat you up but there is no one passing by,the only things that you can do are SCREAM FIRE , talk to them/him , or use Violence.
You could scream "FIRE!" (So that someone could help you)what if no one comes ?.....you could try talking to them/him ...... But if it doesn't work either?....you could try using violence (but that doesn't always work).So that is why I chose both because violence and words doesn't always work.
Violence,is it really necessary ? .....sometimes it is not,because it will have consequences. Like getting in trouble , causing more violence and etc . You know words are very hurtful sometimes such as bad words and they could also cause violence/a fight. This shows that both violence and words are very hurtful.
can violence be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation? violence is wrong in many situations. as mahatma gandhi once said" non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind,it is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the igenuity of man." this paper will discuss why violence is an unreasonable responce to an unreasonable situation.
violence effects a lot of people. families are worried about their children(us),lets face it lots of people care about others.families are worried that their children will get bullied. for example a boy went walking down a street 20 metres away from home. he had $20 and big bullies came to steal the money, itis already late and he still is not at home.this is what makes parents worried.
violence will get you in trouble. by who you ask? well you will get in trouble by parents, teachers etc. for example, say my friend gabi punched me in the face, but she didn't do it on purpose but i thought it was purposly, so i told the teacher and she got in trouble. this shows that violence is an unreasonable response to an unreasonable situation.
violence is not a reasonable response to an unresonable situation. violence is wrong in many situations. some of the reasons are that you will get in trouble and that it(violence) effects a lot of people.
Violence can't be a reasonable resposponse to an unreasonable situation. POW! some kid ust punched your face straight in to a wall. What do you do, punch them back? Hold on did you say punch them back? How dare you! Violence is never the optionto anything. In this piece of writing I will clearly outline three reasons why violence can't be a reasonable response to an unreasonable stiuation.
Getting yourself and the violent person who decided to punch you in to trouble is more worse than getting the bully in trouble. If you were to punch them back it is less likely for someone to help because you decided to make a simple misatke. For example if you were about to explain to a teacher that you were punched straiht in to a wall and later on told them you tried to resolve it by punching them back, they'd probably just run off.
Having a bruise on your face is only a minor injury and if you were to punch them back it would definetly end up a severe injury. Punching the person back is trigering a fist fight. For example bullies do not want to let you win a fight so they'll end up finishing you off,by slapping,kicking or punching you until you get really injured.
Violence can definetly not be a reasonable response to anything! Getting the bully in to trouble and avoiding getting severly injured is the way to og. And that's why violence can't be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation.
Violence isn't always the answer to everything. Especially if it's for no reason. In this I well be giving you 3 reasons why I disagree with violence can be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation.
If I was just walking around all by myself and two boys or bully's approached me and said "Give me your money!" I would use my words and say "I don't have any! I'm only little!" And run off. But If they never let me go I would have to fight because they won't go away. And since I know self defence I would use my kungfu.
Violence solves nothing. The only time you should use violence is when you have no choice. For example self defence. If the bully makes their move you make your move. One thing you can do is yell out "Help! Help!" And more people well notice and come and help you.
Using words is much more helpful than using violence for example. If you were in a fight with one of your friends would you use violence to get your own way? No! I think if you try to or talk it through with your friends you well get your way. But if that don't work get help from your teacher or someone else.
In conclusion, I disegree against violence can be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation because you can use your words, yell out help, or get help from the teacher or someone else. That's why I disagree with violence can be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation.
What would you do if bullys wanted to hit you?
Would you call out FIRE or fight back you would probably choose fight back.If you choose that answer I say i agree to disagree why fight when you can make things awkward or hid in the garage bin so the smell can scare them away.
You can make the conversation awkward like it's a lovely day today or I like your hair , pull their pants down or something throw crab apple's at them and I don't care where you get them just get a 1 kg at the market and keep it in your bag.
You can call out FIRE it's more likely to get someones attention and they can help you with your situation.
You can also hide in a trash can and cover your self with stinky stuff so when you come out the stink can scare them away they will be like" ewwwwwww what's that smell lets get outa here.
I belive that violence is a reasonable responce in an unfair situation.Violence is a good thing in self defence and compations,compations meaning karate and all that stuff.So i will explain why.
Say your're in a dark alley way and a giant comes up to you.You have no chose but to fight him.You really don't won't to,you really just won't to talk about it but you can't. If you didn't fight him he would make you into a pancake with no clothes.So that is one reason violence is a good thing in a bad situation.
There is another way you could use violence and to protect yourself and that's by learning self defence.Self defence is something alot of people learn these days mainly for fun,but sometimes you never know.So if you learnt self defence and someone aprroched you saying "give me your money".Y ou could defend yourself and stay clear of bad people or bullies.
I know how to protecet myself how about you? So now you should be able to protect yourself with self defence.Or if you don't know any just try to aim at him/her,but that's the only time you can fight someone.If it's any other time it's either illigle or for a compation.
Alright, imagine you've hit a dead end in a hedge maze being chased by 2 bullies armed with machine guns loaded with 10000000 rounds of ammunition, flamethrowers, chainsaws, clubs and tasers. What do you do, your unarmed and violence is the only answer, unless you want to die. This is what I'm writing about today and in my book violence can be reasonable in some situations . My reasons include you can get killed if you don't and you can sacrifice your life for others. If your still not convinced listen to my arguments!
Firstly, if your in a fight and you don't fight you can die. This means that if you're about to be hit, talking won't help at all. Alright remember the 2 bullies, you can't say compromise by the way where did you get the machine guns? It's far too late and if you don't fight you'll die.
Finally, , violence can be used to protect. A good example are the ANZAC soldiers the fought and risked their lives for us. This is my final reason why violenc is reasonable.
In conclusion, for all reasons written above I strongly believe violence is reasonable. Don't you?
Can violence be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation? I think violence can be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation because talking doesn't solve everything and if your not violent you may get badly injured.
Talking doesn't solve everything. This is because some people who want to beat you up don't care about what your saying. for instance if a black belt chubby dude chases you into a dead end alleyway and you say "dude i don't want to fight, but honestly your mum is ugly." He wouldn't care if you don't want to fight, proberly saying that would make the situation worse. This shows that talking doesn't sovle the problem and makes the situation worse.
If your not violent you may get badly injured. To elaborate if your about to get punched or kicked you have to use violence on them or in other terms self defense. For exsample if someone puts a gun to your head, you would need to use violence on that person to protect yourself. That is why you got to use violence so you won't get hurt.
Obviosily violence can be a reasonable reponse to an unreasonable situation because talking doen't solve anything and if if your not violent you may get badly injured. What should we do if we are about to get beaten up? we should defend are self by using violence on the people who are gonna beat you up and dont talk.
can voilence be a reasanable risponce to a unreasanable situation i think its not a good risponce be cause when you hit some one they will hit you back and you will boath get in trouble for hitting each other.
what should you do if your in a really dark ally whay with rats running aroung your feet ans then two big buff bullies come slowly walking towards you bloking all the exits thn finally arrives at you and say where is all your money you say i gots none then what to do you eather talk thenb out of betting you up thrtin them or when you have nothing left to do and when i say nothing i mean nothing nothing you slap on the face then when they move you run.
like ghandi all ways said voilence never solves anything he is right because when you hit some one the'll hit you back or if you send a nuke to a nother country thell get mad
Violence is not a reasonable response for anything. There are multiple reasonable responses, depending on the situation violence is not one of them. You will not get any benifit at all by punching somebody with a creepy face. You would just provoke someone bigger to punc you back. Violence is never the star of something good.
If somebody came up to you and said that they needed your money would you with knowing why or who they were start punching them like crazy? I don't tink violence sould be used in any situation no matter how unreasonable it is. Why would anybody need to use violence? Hurting someone physically won't make anything better it will just make te problem worse. For example if you and your only friend were were walking and all of a sudden they say that you're fat but you were actuallyreally healthy and you punched her you just went from being slightly offended to loosing your only friend.
Violence should be te last respone anybody should think of. There are multiple of reasonable reactions like,yell for help,ask why they would do that,try make them feel guilty,call someone or tell them what they're doing is stupid. Violence is not om the list. Violence is never going be the end of something not even war the end of one war is peace and if it's not then it hasn't ended yet. Violence is not a sensible respone.
To punch or not to punch that is not a question violence souldn't be tolerated because if you physically hurt someone it won't solve anyting but cost you more and there are heaps of sensible reactions that won't get anybody hurt not you them. So do you agree with me?
Hey hey! Anyway you should know what I'm writing but if you don't I'm writing about if violence can be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation. So I would totally use violence in this situation.
Here's one way you can use violence to protect yourself from bullies or other people. You can use self defense if you know it. Right? Back to the point. The reason I chose this is because you can punch and right people! Also because you don't have to use just your hands and feet. You can use objects. For some examples you can use a metal bat or you can get a random garbage bin from the street. This proves that self defense is good to use when your I this situation.
If you try and use words to try and stop them from fighting you... DON'T DO IT! Because while your talking they're just going to kick you and punch you over and OVER again. To explain into you in a short version: after your finished talking, you would've been beat up. So that's why you shouldn't use words instead of violence in an unreasonable situation.
In conclusion you should use self defense and don't use violence to stop violence. That's why violence can be a reasonable response to an unreasonable situation.
POW! OWW! Could violence be a reasonable response to an un reason able situation? It actuly depends on what type of situation or person you are like smart or stupid or normal. For example if your smart violence won't happen if your stupid more violence my happen. But i don't think violence is not the answer.
DING!DING!DING! I dont think can be a resonalbe response to an unreasonable situation because if you hurt someone you may go to jail or you may be punch by other kids. thats why violence can can't be an unreasonable to unreasonalbe situation.
Violence should be used.Why won't you fight? FIGHT! don't be a baby! what if a bully comes and ask for your money. what, your just going to stand there do something, or he will keep on bullying you!
Words don't always work. Violence is a solution. If you use words the bully will keep on bullying you.
If a bully ask for your money then you try to run but he grabs you. kick him or something the he learns his lesson.
that is why violence should be used.
Violence, does it even solve anything? The only thing violence solves is war (which was started by violenece). Violence is the most usless action before twerking. It's for this reason and the fact that you can get in trouble is why I'm disagreeing to the fact that violence is reasonable.
For starters you can get arrested for doing something completly idiotic. Imagion your mugging someone for there money, you can either go to jail or get a job earn your money. You can either earn the money or "earn" the money.
Secondly violence solves nothing. It can end things but it won't solve it. For example, if you and your friend are in a fight you, you can punch him or talk to him. If you punch him but he'll leave you alone but he won't forgive you. This shows that violence solves nothing.
In conclusion violence is usless because you'll probably go to jail and it doesn't solve anything.
. Violence is never a solution to solve problems. People get hurt during fights for no reason you should instead use your voice and opion, you can get in big trouble from family, police,teachers and principals. Violence does'nt solve anything
Whats the point of starting chaos when people just get hurt. Violence can be an overeaction for an unreasonable situation. For example fighting about a maths question and using violence is an unreasonable solution to soving the problem People just get hurt for no reason at all. Would you use violence to get your way about who plays on the ipad?
Another reason is using violence in school or on the street gets you in big trouble. For example if you're fighting in school and punching each other you get in trouble from the principal and teachers. The police could show up to the school to break up the fight. Family would know about the fight and you could be expelled.
Also saying what you think and opinion could help in an unreasonable situation. For example if fighting over a maths promblem saying what you're answer and explaining it is better than punching each other. Words don
't always help but it is better to use words than violence.
In conclusion Violence is never a solution to solve problems. People get hurt during fights for no reason you should instead use your voice and opion, you can get in big trouble from family, police,teachers and principals. Violence does'nt solve anything. That is why i believe violence is not a reasonable respnsese to an unreasonable situation.
Hello people of the world,i think you didn't see that coming... i disagree beacause they can end up in hospital for example if you go to a dark alley and you have yourself and someone's theratinig you,straightt away call the cops weather it's your best friend or not so many people get bullied over 10million people get bullied false fact to be continued
Float like a butterfly sting like a bee. Violence should be a reasonable reasponce to an unreasonable situation because when you are held up by two bullies with no where to go you have to get in Mohamad Alimode that means you have to get ready to fight,or else you can just stand their and get beat . That'swhy you have to use violenc in a unreasonable situation.
Hee Yah!! Violence, violence violence. What do you think when you hear that word? Is it being beat up by bullies or standing up for yourself or is it just having a fight with your sibling. I would say Violence can NOT be a reasonable response to unreasonable situations. In this writing piece I will tell you why.
Violence is not the way to solve unreasonable situations unless you really have to use it. You can use violence if someone is trying to steal you, if someone is trying to touch you inapropriatly or if a bully is beating you up. I'm going to tell you how to deal with a bully beating you up. You can...
.try run away .ring your parents (if you have a phone)
.scream fire .tell bullies parents the next day
and there are many more ways. That's why I Think that violence is not a way to solve unreasonable situations unless you really have to.
Violence is normaly the first option in a fight. They make their move you make your move. Is that how you want the world to be? I surley don't. When I have a fight with my sisters they kick, punch and wack me and I retaliate. That is why I belive violence isn't the way to solve a problem.
In conclusion, I think even though many of us use it . I think Ghandi would have been proud if the world had no violence, no wars, no fights and no chess games with people as pieces. That is why I think violence can't be a reasonable response to unreasonable situations. What do you think ? Do you agree or disagree?
ok lissind i am hier to tork to you abawt is vilns or can it be solvd with pes exampl to boles pos you in to a ale way what do you do
A scrm fia
B ''tri'' to bet them up
C pay thme $$$$$$$$$$$
I blev that fieting is the way is the anser war is over if yo wont it!.